Texas Administrative Code (Last Updated: March 27,2024) |
TITLE 1. ADMINISTRATION |
PART 8. TEXAS JUDICIAL COUNCIL |
CHAPTER 174. INDIGENT DEFENSE POLICIES AND STANDARDS |
SUBCHAPTER C. POLICY MONITORING REQUIREMENTS |
DIVISION 2. POLICY MONITORING PROCESS AND BENCHMARKS |
SECTION 174.27. Risk Assessment
Latest version.
-
(a) A risk assessment of each county shall be conducted by the policy monitoring team each fiscal year as the primary means of determining which counties will be selected for on-site policy monitoring. On-site monitoring visits to counties shall then be apportioned by administrative judicial region, county size, risk assessment scores, past visits, and other documented factors. The risk assessment shall use a variety of factors related to the provision of indigent defense services, including but not limited to the following: (1) Investigation and expert witness expenses; (2) Reimbursements for attorney fees; (3) Per capita indigent defense expenses; (4) Felony, misdemeanor, and juvenile attorney appointment rates; (5) County population; (6) Complaints about a county received by the Commission; (7) Receipt of a TIDC improvement grant; (8) Requests for counsel during magistrate warnings under Article 15.17, Code of Criminal Procedure; and (9) Appellate cases. (b) Counties may receive monitoring visits as a result of factors outside of the risk assessment, including findings from a previous visit, a complaint, media reports, or a request from an elected state or local official. If Commission staff make a drop-in visit, fiscal monitoring review, or grant program review and determine that violations of the Fair Defense Act or Commission rules may be present in a county, the monitor may conduct a monitoring visit of the county's procedures. Source Note: The provisions of this §174.27 adopted to be effective September 23, 2015, 40 TexReg 6349; amended to be effective April 13, 2020, 45 TexReg 2409